Our Commitment: Science First. Always.

At Durand Health, we believe your health decisions should be guided by evidence, not marketing.

The health and wellness industry is experiencing a surge of premium screening products marketed directly to consumers and employers. From multi-cancer blood tests costing thousands of dollars to full-body MRI scans and direct-to-consumer longevity blood panels, the promise is compelling: detect disease before it starts.

We understand the appeal. Early detection saves lives. We have built our entire practice around prevention and early intervention.

But there is a critical difference between proven science and premature commercialization. And we believe Canadians deserve to know the difference.

Durand Health does not offer, promote, or recommend health screening products or tests that have not been validated by rigorous, peer-reviewed clinical evidence and endorsed by recognized professional medical societies.
 
 
THE GALLERI MULTI-CANCER BLOOD TEST
 
GRAIL’s Galleri test claims to detect 50+ cancer types from a single blood draw. It costs over $2,000 in Canada (more than double the US list price of $949) and is available through a single provider that holds exclusive national distribution rights.
 
The test is not approved by Health Canada.
The test is not approved by the US Food and Drug Administration.
The test has not been endorsed by any professional medical society.
 
On February 19, 2026, the largest randomized controlled trial ever conducted on multi-cancer early detection testing reported its results. The NHS-Galleri trial studied 142,000 people across England over three years. The primary endpoint was not met. The test did not produce a statistically significant reduction in late-stage cancer diagnoses.
 
The New York Times reported this story on the front page of its print edition:
 
“Grail’s Cancer Detection Test Fails in Major Study”
By Rebecca Robbins and Gina Kolata
The New York Times, Section A, Page 1, February 21, 2026 
https://www.nytimes.com/2026/02/20/health/grail-cancer-test-galleri-results.html (subscription may be required to access the full article)   (PDF Version)
 
 
GRAIL’s stock dropped approximately 50% following the announcement.
 
Dr. Eric Topol, Director of the Scripps Research Translational Institute, one of the most cited scientists in the world with over 1,200 peer-reviewed publications and a TIME 100 honoree, stated: “The trial is negative. End. Stop. Period.” (GenomeWeb, February 20, 2026)
 
Dr. Adewole Adamson, a cancer researcher at the University of Texas at Austin’s Dell Medical School, told the New York Times: the study failed. “End of story.” (The New York Times, February 20, 2026)
 
Dr. Richard Houlston, who studies cancer genetics at the Institute of Cancer Research in Britain, told the New York Times: the Galleri test is “not a very good test” and the results do not support rollout within the American health care system. (The New York Times, February 20, 2026)
 
Dr. Eleftherios Diamandis, a professor at the University of Toronto’s laboratory medicine department and medical biochemist at Mount Sinai Hospital and University Health Network, has published critical analyses of the Galleri test for seven years, including a paper titled “Implosion of Grail’s Galleri Cancer Screening Test?” (PubMed Central, 2025)
 
Our team at Durand reviewed the damning research published in the Lancet in December 2024 and concluded the science was not ready. Others in the market raced to secure exclusive deals and build insurer partnerships around this technology, perhaps for business reasons. We chose a different path. We chose science.
 
 
FULL-BODY MRI SCREENING
 
Full-body MRI scans are being marketed to healthy Canadians at prices ranging from $2,500 to $5,000+, promoted by celebrity endorsements and social media influencers as a way to “find cancer before it finds you.”
 
No professional medical society recommends full-body MRI screening for healthy, asymptomatic patients without risk factors.
 
The American College of Radiology stated: “At this time, the ACR does not believe there is sufficient evidence to justify recommending total body screening for patients with no clinical symptoms, risk factors or a family history suggesting underlying disease or serious injury. To date, there is no documented evidence that total body screening is cost-efficient or effective in prolonging life.” (ACR Statement, 2023)
 
The American Academy of Family Physicians stated: “There are no data suggesting that these imaging studies will improve survival or improve the likelihood of finding a tumor (estimated tumor detection is less than 2% in asymptomatic patients screened).” (AAFP / Choosing Wisely)
 
Dr. Matthew Davenport, a radiologist at the University of Michigan, stated: “There is a reason that there is no cancer society, radiology society, or credited medical society that recommends whole-body MRI screening in asymptomatic healthy patients without risk factors. It is not a safe and effective way to detect potential ailments early in the average healthy person.” (Michigan Medicine, 2025)
 
Research shows that 15% to 30% of all diagnostic imaging in adult patients contains at least one incidental finding. These are abnormalities that are doing no harm and would never have been found without the scan. These findings trigger unnecessary biopsies, specialist referrals, cascading medical costs, and significant patient anxiety, often without improving outcomes.
 
 
DIRECT-TO-CONSUMER “LONGEVITY” BLOOD PANELS
 
A growing number of telehealth platforms are now selling “longevity” blood panels directly to Canadian consumers, testing 30-40 biomarkers and providing a “biological age” score, often without the context of a comprehensive physician-led health assessment, without integration into an ongoing care relationship, and without the clinical judgment needed to interpret results within a patient’s full health picture.
 
A blood test without context is just a number. At Durand, we believe testing must be part of a longitudinal health relationship, not a one-time transaction marketed as “empowerment.”
 
We do not oppose blood biomarker testing. We include advanced biomarker panels in our own health assessments. The difference is that our testing is physician-led, clinically integrated, and interpreted within the full context of your health history, genetics, lifestyle, and goals, by a team that knows you and follows you year after year.
Durand Health provides evidence-based, physician-led health intelligence for executives and all levels of staff.
 
Our approach: Comprehensive Health Assessments: Leveraging proven, continuously evolving testing protocols, from advanced cardiovascular imaging and resting metabolic analysis to pharmacogenomics and metabolic health panels. Every test we include has a clinical reason for being there. We do not pad our assessments with unproven premium add-ons.
 
Year-Round Circle of Care: Your Durand health team, including physicians, nurse practitioners, naturopaths, chiropractors, health navigators, and mental health professionals, works with you throughout the year. We track progress, adjust interventions, and keep you accountable. Health is not a single-day event. It is a lifelong journey.
 
Testing That Is Integrated, Not Isolated: Every result is interpreted within your full clinical picture: your genetics, your lifestyle, your family history, your goals. That is how you turn data into outcomes. That is what separates health intelligence from health marketing.
 
We believe in governing your health over time, not gambling on a single test.
If you are an employer, insurer, or benefits broker looking for a health partner that puts science before sales, we welcome the conversation.
We offer customizable Executive and Staff Health Assessments, ongoing Circle of Care memberships, and integration with your existing benefits plan. We can work with your team to design a program that meets your organization’s needs without relying on unproven premium screening products to inflate the price.
Your employees deserve health partners who follow the evidence. So do you.

Healthcare hype is not healthcare.

On February 21, 2026, the largest randomized controlled trial in the history of multi-cancer early detection reported that the leading test on the market failed its primary endpoint. 142,000 participants. Three years. NHS England. The New York Times ran the story on its front page:

 

“Grail’s Cancer Detection Test Fails in Major Study” — Rebecca Robbins and Gina Kolata, The New York Times, Section A, Page 1, February 21, 2026 https://www.nytimes.com/2026/02/20/health/cancer-detection-test-grail.html

Dr. Eric Topol, one of the most cited physician-scientists in the world, summarized the result plainly: “The trial is negative. End. Stop. Period.”

 

That was six weeks ago. As of today, the single premium Canadian clinic that locked up exclusive national distribution rights for GRAIL’s Galleri test is still actively promoting it on its homepage. Still selling it at more than double the US list price of $949. The test is not approved by Health Canada. Not approved by the FDA. Not endorsed by any professional medical society. A major Canadian insurer launched a partnership to offer it to policyholders eight days before the trial results were released. And nothing has changed.

 

We reviewed the critical warnings published in The Lancet in early 2024, which flagged the test’s low sensitivity for early-stage cancer (27.5% for stage 1-2), the false positive burden on health systems, and the absence of mortality data. We never considered offering this product. The science was never there. https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(23)02830-1/fulltext

 

This is part of a broader pattern in both the US and Canada that should concern every employer, every benefits professional, and every patient paying out of pocket for premium health services.

 

Full-body MRI scans costing $2,500 to $3,500+ CAD in Canada (and up to $4,499 USD in major US markets) are being marketed to healthy, asymptomatic patients despite the American College of Radiology, the American Academy of Family Physicians, and the FDA all declining to recommend them. No professional medical society in North America endorses full-body MRI screening for people without symptoms or risk factors.

And then there are the mass blood testing platforms. This is where Canadians and Americans need to pay very close attention.

 

A growing number of companies in both countries are selling “longevity” and “preventive” blood panels, some requiring 20 vials of blood drawn across two separate clinic visits. These are unfocused, blanket draws done in the absence of any patient history, prior bloodwork, or clinical intake, because these platforms lack the technology and the physician relationships to personalize what they order. Without knowing where you have been, they have no idea where to look. So they test everything. And they charge you for the privilege.

 

The testing itself is almost entirely standard laboratory bloodwork available from any accredited lab. There is nothing proprietary about it. And the vast majority of these biomarkers are already covered by government health insurance or employer benefits plans. In Canada, your family doctor can order comprehensive bloodwork and OHIP or your provincial plan covers virtually all of it. In the US, most employer health plans and Medicare cover standard preventive lab panels at no cost-sharing under the ACA.

You are not paying these companies for unique tests. You are paying for marketing, packaging, and an app.

 

Worse, these tests are fundamentally rearward-looking. They tell you what your biomarkers were on the day of the blood draw. A snapshot. Not a trajectory. And some of these platforms then generate a “biological age” score using Levine’s Phenotypic Age algorithm, which is a mathematical formula applied to nine standard clinical biomarkers that your family doctor already tests. This is not epigenetic analysis. It is not measuring DNA methylation or molecular aging. It is running a calculation on routine bloodwork and presenting it as longevity science. There is a meaningful difference between genuine epigenetic age measurement, which requires actual DNA methylation analysis at hundreds of specific genomic sites, and phenotypic age extrapolation from a basic blood panel. Most consumers do not know this. Most of these platforms do not explain it.

 

Some of these companies market themselves with impressive-sounding institutional affiliations, listing connections to leading universities, major health systems, and cancer hospitals. Look closer. In many cases these “affiliations” simply mean someone on their staff once worked at one of those institutions. That is not a research partnership. That is not a clinical collaboration. That is a resume line being used as a marketing asset.

 

Employers and individuals also need to ask hard questions about data privacy. Some of these platforms bury broad data licensing terms in their terms of service, granting themselves worldwide, perpetual rights to use your health data for product development, de-identified datasets, and marketing. In the US, many operate outside traditional HIPAA-covered relationships. In Canada, the regulatory framework for direct-to-consumer health data is often unclear. If you are an employer considering these platforms for your workforce, ask: who owns the data? Where does it go? Can it be resold?

 

Here is the bigger picture. US employer healthcare costs are projected to rise 9% to 9.5% in 2026, the highest single-year increase in over a decade, exceeding $17,000 per employee. On a compounded basis, costs are projected to be 62% higher than 2017 levels. Cancer is the number one condition driving employer costs for the fourth consecutive year. The system is broken, and it is broken because it operates on a break-fix model: wait until employees get sick, then spend enormous sums treating preventable conditions.

 

None of these hype-driven products fix that. A $2,000 cancer blood test that failed its trial does not fix it. A $3,500 full-body MRI that no medical society recommends does not fix it. A 20-vial blood draw through an app with no clinical follow-through does not fix it. These are expensive band-aids marketed as innovation.

 

What fixes it is a fundamentally different model. Continuous, preventive health intelligence that catches signals early, engages employees in their health over time, and navigates them to the right interventions before conditions become catastrophic and costly.

 

At Durand Future Health, we build exactly that. A Health Intelligence Platform that is forward-looking, not rearward-looking. We take the biological signals already available, add advanced testing where the science actually justifies it, including genuine epigenetic analysis, and wrap it in continuous, AI-driven care navigation that keeps employees engaged in their health for life. Physician-led. Evidence-based. Secure, with employee data never resold. Measured by outcomes, not by how many vials we can draw or how much we can charge for a single visit.

 

We help employers, insurers, and government payors move from the break-fix model that is bankrupting the system to a preventive, continuous guidance model that reduces spend, reduces productivity losses, and maximizes health outcomes for every dollar spent.

 

Outcomes over profit. Science over speed. Patients over shareholders.

 

We do not sell fear. We do not sell lottery tickets. We build health intelligence that compounds over time.

Durand® With You for Life®.

Evidence-based. Physician-led. Continuously evolving. For executives and all levels of staff.

Book a complimentary consultation to learn how Durand Health can serve your organization.

durandhealth.com | durand.life | 905-527-1342 | contact@durandhealth.com

Book An Appointment

Our team aims to offer the best possible care. BOOK TODAY to find out how we can help!

Book An Appointment